He was free, again. But his days outside the walls would be numbered.<\/p>\n
Three months after being imprisoned for missing parole appointments and failing drug tests, Anthony Woods was scooped up by a corrections bus at San Quentin State Prison and dumped a few blocks from this mother’s home.<\/p>\n
He looked down as he walked at first, watching one foot step in front of the other.<\/p>\n
It didn\u2019t take long to slip.<\/p>\n
\u201cI remember thinking \u2018don\u2019t look up,\u2019 just go straight home,\u201d Woods said.<\/p>\n
But on the walk from the bus stop to his mom\u2019s house, he couldn\u2019t elude his long time tormenter: Crack cocaine.<\/p>\n
\u201cI had a few bucks, it was burning a hole in my pocket,\u201d Woods said. \u201cThis is a neighborhood that\u2019s infested,\u201d Woods shook his head. \u201cI can\u2019t walk two blocks without the opportunity being there.\u201d<\/p>\n
Woods, 49, has two felonies on his record stemming from an armed robbery in the early 1980s.<\/p>\n
He\u2019s been on parole ever since.<\/p>\n
Released in 1986, Woods has been in and out of California prisons at least 17 times according to prison records, mostly for dirty drug tests, missed appointments and \u201ctechnical violations\u201d of his parole.<\/p>\n
Woods is just one of a group \u2013 tens of thousands strong \u2013 of ex-convicts paroled in California every year. They often face bleak prospects for employment and debilitating drug addictions.<\/p>\n
And more than 70 percent of the time, they prove unable to comply with the terms of their parole.<\/p>\n
Last year, more than 66,000 paroled felons were returned to custody without being convicted of a crime. The violations that land them back in prison include failing drug tests and missed appointments with parole agents.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey go in, they spend on average about two months, they continue to get released, they\u2019re out about an average of four to six months, they\u2019re back in,\u201d said Joan Petersilia, a law professor at Stanford. \u201cPrisoners on the inside refer to this as \u2018doing life on the installment plan.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n
CDCR is working to reduce its population to comply with a ruling last year by a three-judge federal panel.<\/p>\n
State law SB3x18, which took effect in January, released parolees convicted of non-violent crimes from traditional parole supervision.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s estimated that about 10,000 people who would have gone to prison last year will not go to prison this year,\u201d Petersilia said.<\/p>\n
The law aims to lower the costs of imprisoning and supervising convicts who pose little threat.<\/p>\n
Recidivism has been a major driver of skyrocketing corrections costs, which gobble up about 11 percent of the state budget, or roughly $8 billion \u2013 more than the state spends on higher education.<\/p>\n
In 2008, 136,000 prisoners in California were released into California communities.<\/p>\n
As part of the reform, parole agents are handling reduced caseloads while thousands of gang members and other felons have been put on electronic tracking devices as an alternative to incarceration.<\/p>\n
More than seven in 10 parolees return to prison within three years in California, the nation\u2019s worst rate, according to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger\u2019s office.<\/p>\n
The state spends about $49,500 per year to house a prisoner, Petersilia said.<\/p>\n
\u201cA major part of what determines whether a parolee will be successful or not is employment,\u201d said Theodore Pacheco, a parole agent who has worked specifically with Woods\u2019 case. \u201cWe show them the vocational, educational and drug treatment opportunities available to them when they get out.\u201d<\/p>\n
But upon release, parolees are more often poised to fail than succeed, said Richmond Police Chief Chris Magnus.<\/p>\n
\u201cA lot of our ongoing crime is committed by folks who are recidivists,\u201d Magnus said. \u201cBudget cuts for important programs inside prisons mean that inmates land on our streets often worse off than they were when they went in.\u201d<\/p>\n
In July, Pacheco remanded Woods to custody barely a month after his release for missing several appointments and testing positive for drugs. Woods spent more than two weeks in custody, including a trip back to San Quentin State Prison for just a few days, where he said he went through a familiar battery of intake processes.<\/p>\n
Before the mid-1970s, prison sentences were indeterminate, Petersilia said, so inmates could be released earlier than their original sentence if they completed vocational or academic classes in addition to good behavior.<\/p>\n
Now, sentencing reforms have resulted in \u201cdeterminant\u201d sentences, Petersilia said, which has resulted in inmates receiving guaranteed release dates, despite cuts in rehabilitation programs leaving them ill-prepared to return to society.<\/p>\n
Woods, with his robbery convictions from the early 1980s, still qualifies as a two-striker and a parolee who could pose a threat.<\/p>\n
Stories like Woods\u2019 are a big part of California\u2019s corrections crisis, said Barry Krisberg, a senior fellow at the Berkeley Center for Criminal Justice.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019re just recycling people over and over and over through this system,\u201d Krisberg said. \u201cAnd a lot of them for fairly minor offenses, who continue to have drug problems or whatever, and we lock them up for 90 days, which costs a lot of money and does not advance public safety.\u201d<\/p>\n
According to CDCR records, of 84,882 paroled felons who were returned to prison last year, 66,261 were returned for violating conditions of their parole, not for committing new crimes.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis makes no sense,\u201d Petersilia said. \u201cUnfortunately we don\u2019t have the political will to change it because there will be a parolee \u2026 now out on parole and they\u2019ll miss an appointment or test positive and we won\u2019t send them back to prison and they\u2019ll murder someone.\u201d<\/p>\n
The California Rehabilitation Oversight Board (C-ROB) issued a report in March warning that cuts to already stripped down educational and vocational programs in state prisons jeopardized efforts to reduce prison populations.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe recent budget cut to inmate programming may well mean that the hope for reduction in recidivism will not be achieved any time soon. Without some reduction in the parole return rate it seems likely that California will be unable to get control of the inmate population crisis,\u201d the report read.<\/p>\n
Recidivism wasn\u2019t always an intractable problem.<\/p>\n
In 1980, only about one of four parolees ended up back in prison.<\/p>\n
A 2003 report from the Little Hoover Commission brought California corrections\u2019 recidivism problem to the fore when it showed that most parolees were returned to prison for technical violations, memorably calling the system a \u201cbillion-dollar failure.\u201d<\/p>\n
CDCR spokeswoman Terry Thornton points to reports that show inmate populations on a steady decline.<\/p>\n
The state has shed prisoners for three straight years, including a drop of more than 4,000 in 2009.<\/p>\n
Back in Richmond, Woods has little hope for reform that may affect him. He said he is resigned to a life of cycling in and out of prison.<\/p>\n
The reason? He has no illusions about ceasing his use of crack cocaine.<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t see how I\u2019ll ever quit,\u201d he said, rolling a small, glass crack pipe between his thumb and forefinger. He added that he wishes he could stop.<\/p>\n
Moments later, he\u2019s ambling off to a liquor store on the corner near his mother\u2019s home.<\/p>\n
Within minutes, he scores $8 worth of crack cocaine \u2013 a small bag with two BB-sized rocks pressed into a handshake \u2013 some of which he quickly loads into his pipe.<\/p>\n
He takes refuge in a nearby park. He squats behind some weathered bleachers, which shelter him from a mild breeze.<\/p>\n
He reasons that because he smoked crack on the day of his release, he would already \u201ctest dirty\u201d if required by parole to submit urine.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt doesn\u2019t matter anymore,\u201d he said, lowering the glass pipe into the orange flame of his butane lighter. \u201cIf they want to send me back, what can I do?\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The key to easing overcrowding in California prisons is reducing the number of parolees who return.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":223,"parent":147,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"template-video.php","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-155","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/berkeley.news21.com\/behindbars\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/155","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/berkeley.news21.com\/behindbars\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/berkeley.news21.com\/behindbars\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/berkeley.news21.com\/behindbars\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/berkeley.news21.com\/behindbars\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=155"}],"version-history":[{"count":28,"href":"http:\/\/berkeley.news21.com\/behindbars\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/155\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":533,"href":"http:\/\/berkeley.news21.com\/behindbars\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/155\/revisions\/533"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/berkeley.news21.com\/behindbars\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/147"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/berkeley.news21.com\/behindbars\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/223"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/berkeley.news21.com\/behindbars\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=155"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}